Most business clients
rightfully complain about the level of payroll (FICA or SE) taxes on their
income.
In todays blog I will discuss few strategies and planning which can reduce the burden off social security taxes on small business owners .
In todays blog I will discuss few strategies and planning which can reduce the burden off social security taxes on small business owners .
Maximizing
S Shareholder Distributions to Minimize Payroll Taxes
The taxable income passed through by an S corporation
to shareholder-employees is not self-employment income for SE tax purposes
This has lead to the tax
planning strategy of minimizing the salary of S corporation
shareholder-employees (and thus minimizing the payroll tax liability) and
maximizing the amounts treated as S corporation dividend distributions.
This still gets the cash in the hands of the shareholder-employee while
minimizing the payroll tax burden. However, the taxpayer's age and
qualification for maximum social security benefits should be considered before
minimizing the current year payroll taxes. Also, the effect on the capacity to make
deductible contributions to tax-favored retirement plan accounts should be
considered (i.e., reduced salaries equates to reduced retirement plan
contributions).
Example : Minimizing salary income
of S corporation shareholder-employees.
Amit is the
sole shareholder of Shanti Inc., an S corporation. He works full-time in the
business. During the current year, the corporation passes through ordinary
income from operations of $85,000. The corporation pays an annual salary to
Amit of $40,000. In addition, the corporation distributes $85,000 to Amit
during the year as a distribution rather than paying this amount out as
additional salary. Thus, wages and distribution payments to Amit for the year total
$125,000.
If the
$40,000 is a reasonable salary for the services performed by Amit, the
transaction will probably withstand IRS scrutiny. In that case, the company and
its shareholder have collectively saved the following amount of FICA tax by not
paying the entire $125,000 as salary income to Amit :
OASDI Savings-[($117,000 wage
base − $40,000 salary) × 12.4%]
|
$ 9,548
|
HI Savings-[($125,000 −
$40,000) × 2.9%]
|
2,465
|
Total FICA tax savings
|
$ 12,013
|
Caution: The IRS is well aware of this
technique and, not surprisingly, frequently challenges such compensation
arrangements as unreasonable. In several court cases, the IRS has successfully
reclassified amounts originally treated as S corporation distributions to
wage income-with the resulting additional FICA tax liability.
Example 4-8: S shareholder
distributions recharacterized as salary.
Assume the
same facts as in Example 4-7 except the IRS determines the $40,000 salary paid
to Amit is unreasonably low. The IRS could recharacterize some or all of the
$85,000 cash distributions as salary income subject to payroll taxes. Payroll
tax penalties could also apply. The pass-through income from the
S corporation would be amended to reflect the deemed wages and additional
payroll taxes.
Thus, the planning
technique works, but it must be used with judgment. In situations where any
question exists, it is probably wise to document why amounts characterized as
wages were not so low as to be unreasonable in relation to the services performed
by the shareholder-employee. In addition, clients should be made aware that
unreasonably low compensation of S corporation shareholder/employees is
sometimes an audit issue with the IRS. Audit exposure is high especially when
the shareholder/employee is a corporate officer,.
Following factors are considered in determining reasonable compensation (a) training
and experience; (b) duties and responsibilities; (c) time and effort devoted to
the business; (d) dividend history; (e) payments to nonshareholder employees,
peers, and subordinates; (f) timing and manner of bonus payments to key
employees; (g) the amount of compensation by comparable businesses for similar
services performed; (h) compensation agreements; and (i) the use of
compensation formulas by the corporation.
Employing
Family Members
Employing family
members can be a useful strategy to reduce overall tax liability. If the family
member is a bona fide employee, then the taxpayer can deduct the wages and
benefits, including medical benefits, paid to the employee on Schedule C or F
as a business expense, thus reducing the proprietor's SE tax liability (
Employing the taxpayer's children can reduce overall tax
liability. Children under age 18 who work for their parents are not subject to
FICA or FUTA taxes. In addition, wage income would be taxed at the child's
lower tax rate and may be wholly or partially offset by the child's standard
deduction of up to $6,200 (for 2014). The wages must be reasonable for the work
done. Additionally, a sole proprietor can provide up to $5,250 in annual
tax-free educational assistance (for both undergraduate and graduate courses)
to each eligible employee and deduct the costs (thus saving both income and SE
taxes). Properly arranged, this benefit is available to the sole proprietor's
child that is (a) age 21 or older, (b) a legitimate employee of the business,
(c) not more than a direct 5% owner of the business, and (d) not a dependent of
the parent business owner.
Caution: Should the IRS choose to
examine wages paid to family members, the taxpayer should be able prove the deduction.
For payments to family members, it is especially important to ensure that basic
business practices (e.g., keeping time reports, filing payroll returns, and
basing pay on work performed, not on a relationship to the employer) are
followed
Incorporating a Sole Proprietorship Can Save Payroll Taxes
If a self-employed client is willing to live with the advantages and disadvantages of corporate taxation, using a C or S corporation can save payroll taxes. This is because essentially all of a sole proprietor's business income is subject to SE tax, while only the wage or salary income of a shareholder-employee is subject to FICA tax.
Incorporating a sole proprietorship can be especially beneficial when the business needs to retain income for expansion or debt retirement. Corporate income, unlike proprietor income, can be retained in the company free of either FICA or SE tax.
Leasing Property to a Closely Held Business
A common tax planning strategy is for individuals to lease property to their closely held corporations or partnerships, especially in those states that do not impose sales or use tax on rental transactions. This can be an effective technique for withdrawing cash from a business entity without FICA or SE taxes, as would otherwise occur with salaries or guaranteed payments
These are some of the strategies that can be used to save social security taxes by effective tax planning .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer About My Blog Posts
Thanks SO much for stopping by my blog. Here are a few things I would like to clarify:
•We do not have an CPA- Client Relationship. We could change that if you so wish. Contact Details Below.
•We cannot provide comprehensive advice on this blog, however well-researched or well-written.
•This blog is not meant to offer legal advice. You need to consult a tax professional for questions regarding your unique situations.
•This blog is not affiliated with my CPA Practice, Ruchi Gupta CPA , LLC.
•I am not responsible for any comments on this blog except my own. So I request you to be civil &and courteous. You can then expect the same treatment from me. Or else I reserve the right to delete your comments
You can contact me through the following methods:
1.Via Email: contact@ruchiguptacpa.com
2.Via Facebook :https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ruchi-Gupta-CPA-LLC/581950175214600
3.Via Phone: (972) 200-3189